Replies to post #68242 on iTalk Inc. (fka TALK)

[beer$$money]

Wrong again. Interesting Concept iTALK as the sub-dealer!!! This BK court knows how to get things done!

6.3 Preservation of Causes of Action

Debtor (or any successors, in
the exercise of its sole discretion), may pursue such Retained Actions so long as it is the best
interests of Debtor (or any successors holding such rights of action.)
https://cdn.pacermonitor.com/pdfserver/4V2AHLA/65504500/United_Mobile_Solutions_LLC__ganbke-16-62537__0106.0.pdf



iTALK will pay the settlement > ITALK
assume the lease for the premises > ITALK
and operate as the sub-dealer > ITALK
ITALK
taking over as tenant on terms agreeable to > ITALK.

T-Mobile is agreeable to allowing Debtor to
operate the store under its current master dealer agreement; however, time is of the essence as
any further delay may threaten T-Mobile’s agreement to allow Debtor to continue to operate as
the master dealer at the Premises. In short, the proposed Settlement Agreement provides that
Debtor’s parent company, ITALK, will pay the settlement amount to Moin, assume the lease for
the Premises and operate as the sub-dealer at the Premises allowing Debtor to continue to
generate master dealer revenues. The Settlement Agreement is contingent upon Bankruptcy
Court approval, and consent and approval of the landlord for the Premises with respect to ITALK
taking over as tenant on terms agreeable to ITALK.

Accordingly, and for reasons detailed herein, the Settlement Agreement is in the
best interests of the estate and its creditors, and approval of the Settlement Agreement is
warranted under Bankruptcy Rule 9019.

[Tesla_se]

UMS owns iTalk and UMS is growing so technically draw your conclusion