Replies to post #371775 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[tcj]

I hope you're right as a shareholder, but humor me and take a look at a pps using the methodology I outlined. It's certainly an appealing avenue for them to take in the event they don't choose what you're proposing.

[Donotunderstand]

your proposal is exactly why it has not happened

[bradford86]

okie dokie

[cfljmljfl]

Yank, I like this settlement plan.....

" The simplest deal for a settlement would be a clean slate agreement that all deals and debts under conservatorship are cancelled and things go back to the way they were in August, 2008. Senior preferred shares are cancelled. Warrants are cancelled. SPD are terminated. The sweep is ended.

So what does the government get for its offset to givebacks? An end to the $400 B backstop. An end to settlement cost risks, at least for the majority of cases pending in courts. An end to Documentgate releases. An end to HUGE DOJ defense costs. And, possibly, a deal to have GSEs write off DTAs and resume paying Federal taxes, albeit at likely lower corporate rates under DT Tax policy revisions.

This is a businesslike sort of settlement. Trump is a businesslike guy.

JMHO "

If you allow me, i would like to offer 2 simple additions

Recap :
The gov pirovides a declining backstop by means
100 % of Determine Total Recap amount
Annually Gov Recap commitment Reduced by federal income tax payable to a capital credit on Fannie balance sheet.
Proceed with reduction until Fannie Is fully recapitalized.

Here is the point.....
Gov taxed the sweeps and TBTF settlements the gov stole.
The annual $18 billion would go a long way to recap.
And, other income would not be stressed to pay dividends to preferred and common .
Nor no need to recap through executing warrants or secondary offering..