Simply put, the testimony put forth by Apple in their IPR petition was incorrect, mischaracterized and wrong. Knobbes is merely pointing this deficiency out to the PTAB board. In other words, they either misinterpreted the classification of claims within Chu & Chu or they lied in an attempt to deceive the board.
---
Excellent explanation. Thanks for that.
Putting the ptab board between a hard rock and an even harder rock means that the ptab probably will end up taking their sweet time to issue any decision on rehearing. I could see the ipr getting decided before the ptab makes a decision on rehearing.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
