Well. I am sure if you look back you would find thousands of posts offering up all sorts of praise and defence of the great things Scott did. Those things were believed my most of those now cursing Scott and praising Dan.
Problem is Dan also has not done 5 things since he took over yet all the praise and all the defense that was given to Scott is now Dans.
History is repeating itself.
I know... Dan got Otto.
And has done exactly what that can be defined as good?
Dan got the former CEO out of the picture. Same thing was said of of Scott.
So far there is not a single difference between Scott and Dan.
There could be... but I feel that if Dan were so much different the msg board would be different as well. People would be backing up their praise with hard fact and not feeling threatened by questions. They would celebrate questions with answers that show how much better things are.
Dan should show the market that he is the embodiment of change and not just play the same game of secrets that every other scammer uses.
When Dan starts acting honest and trustworthy the market will return to this stock. Otherwise it will treat it like the pump and dump he is displaying it as.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
