Replies to post #368212 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[tob999]

I don't see how Sweeney cannot side with shareholders. Such an obvious case of bare faced robbery. Also the fact that she ordered the release of documents in October against Obama administration's protests. Bodes well for shareholders and outcome of this case imo.

Government lawyers trying to hide something? Lol.

Lawyers for the government have responded to the suit with demands for unusual secrecy. The government has withheld 12,000 documents, including emails, memorandums and reports, asserting that they were protected by privilege of three types: privilege of the deliberative process, of bank examination and of presidential communications. Asserting presidential privilege in such a suit is highly unusual

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/05/business/court-orders-us-to-release-documents-on-mortgage-giants.html?_r=0

[navycmdr]

Hello ... SWEENEY has "ALREADY" sided with Shareholders on the priv Document

issue in addition to assigning PUNITIVE SANCTIONS of Atty & LEGAL Fees !!! :-)

She approved the GOVTs delay after delay - gave them ALL the ROPE to Hang Themselves

THEY have ZERO GROUNDS that were given enuf time to make their CASE ...

THEN SHE SHREDDED THEIR priv Document argument with a DETAILED 80 page RULING