InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tarballmonger

12/06/16 8:03 AM

#819 RE: brandao #816

Comparing ACAN to GW is like comparing a Piper Cub airplane to NASA.
My post was not about gwph but if you are trying to compare ACAN to GW you are fooling yourself. To get you started:
1. GW is well funded to carry out its business plan.
2. GW has promise to deliver products that will bring in revenues many times over the ACAN potential.
3. GW is 82% institution owned. ACAN 0%
There is a whole lot more and I suggest that if you are really interested you do your own DD on GW.


icon url

ash111

12/06/16 8:55 AM

#820 RE: brandao #816

I have an explanation.Or GWPH way overbought or ACAN huge undervalued.

ROI might be much impressive w/ACAN imo:

1. GWPH trading at $115, $2.5b market cap. ACAN trading at $1.03, $17m Market cap.

2. GWPH has huge net lose. will need 150 years of 20m revenues/year to justify market cap. btw. per last 10Q, GWPH reported very poor results, only 3m revenues. Nagetive Grow rate a/o today. " has significant and increasing liquidity needs and may
 require additional funding"

3. ACAN has much better SS. Balance sheet is Solid, Assets/liabilities ratio>1 and has one the the lowest deficit the whole sector.

4. $2,000,000 Equity Financing done by Nov 08, 2016,at $1 PPS. the meaning is investors wanna see much higher PPS and be sure they did their DD or potential. Management also has put up over $5 million of their own capital in building the business. none have net income yet but ACAN might be closer than most, Within 7-9 months (as reported) ACAN will complete to build the state’s largest marijuana greenhouse. most weed stocks don't even close to.