InvestorsHub Logo

sidslids

12/04/16 3:38 PM

#4158 RE: BioPharma #4157

i saw that.

sidslids

12/04/16 4:04 PM

#4159 RE: BioPharma #4157

biopharma. i saw that. i did not see a filing at first so i was dismissive of the stock twit post. whatever that guy received in his email is the same prospectus filed 11/29 to the sec.

the prospectus is exactly the same as the one filed 11/10 except that:
1) 11/10 the pps was marked at $1.19
2) 11/29 the pps was marked at $1.69

so what they are doing is getting this on record in case they want to initiate the filing, it does not mean it will be filed as is.

if results come out positive, then i am sure they will revise it once again and then run with it, if negative, then they have the $1.69 pps instead of the $1.19.

i think all they are doing is covering their bases, this is my interpretation and could be wrong.

sidslids

12/04/16 6:51 PM

#4160 RE: BioPharma #4157

hypothetically speaking, let's say they did know the results and filed the s1a on 11/29 knowing that the results were bad and wanted to solidify as high a pps as possible--wouldn't that be insider knowledge? they would not be able to do that, right? am i wrong on that?
all hypothetical. again, i think they are just setting up in case of a worst case scenario, you saw the 3 month, i think this is in the bag as long as we see improvement beyond those photos.