InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

arvitar

12/02/16 2:37 PM

#127543 RE: KMBJN #127536

The one published in the primary scientific literature.

Or the one written by an independent scientist, not working for the company.

Until either one of the above are provided, there's no reason to believe what founders put in book chapters, conference proceedings, and the like, when they're financially motivated to bullshit investors, and have a 12-year record of saying things that turn out not to be true.
icon url

Its_lose_not_loose

12/02/16 2:39 PM

#127545 RE: KMBJN #127536

All self-published tripe.
icon url

Rawnoc

12/02/16 2:53 PM

#127555 RE: KMBJN #127536

What good is "proving" a drug that can never be duplicated again?

No wonder NEVERCIDES keeps changing candidates. They don't have any duplicatable drugs. They only have useless unique snowflakes.