LMAO!!! A 3(a)(10) is filed as part of the settlement when Ross and Ruppert were ripping off shareholders.
You can't file a 3(a)(10) until after or as part of the settlement.
So Ruppert saying, "it s been said from day 1 of this lawsuit and feel free to go back and check the postings that no 3a10 is being here and no shares are wanted. If a 3a10 "scam was being done it would of and could of been done long ago as the notes were from a year before Kim ever took over"
This just more Ruppert BS.
The last Pamela scam was settled on 05/08/2015.
Ruppert was being cut off from the NGCG scam and on 05/25/2016 filed a 3 page complaint Pro Se'.
I have stated very clearly - a copy of the $30,000 check from Pamela to Kalisky wasn't provided in the Court filings - where is it? And why does the signature of Pamela Ruppert keep changing?
I didn't ask about the $30,000 Note - it was a copy of the $30,000 check and that has never been provided.
Why would Pamela pay a $5,000 premium for a $25,000 note when they payoff on the Note was $30,000.
Why did Pamela pay Kalisky $15,000 for a $50,000 note - at the same time she paid $30,000 for a $25,000 Note.
And speaking of Notes how did Jason Ruppert afford to loan Calvin Ross $60,000 when his bankruptcy hadn't been closed?
Damn, there are so many holes in this fraudulent lawsuit against NGCG.
IG
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
