Replies to post #49095 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

Why hasn't Fudd struck a deal with Spain?......and

do these potential legal claims deter the FBAR from issuing recovery permits? Just curious, because any significant find is likely to lead to a court battle, just as this one appears to. Isn't it prudent to head this off at the pass before spending years and years hoping to make such a find you may never get a dime from?

And what's stopping France from winning per the article? No one has a legal rights except Florida, right? On the other hand isn't it likely the FBAR would simply settle for 20% anyway, or even less?

France recovers the treasure, Florida gets a cut, and it's over, right?

Plus, I doubt a recovery permit would have legal standing with pending litigation, correct? A recovery permit is supposed to transfer title to the permit holder. But Florida wouldn't be the ultimate authority, would they?

So Spain sits back and watches and if the Mother Lode that's been hyped is found........BOOM, the bidness plan here implodes.

JMO of course. It's just seems......well, stupid. Another public company returned $17MM in gold to Spain, didn't they? Or was it more than that? And that was because they failed to get legal rights ahead of time. When they found it it was too late to obtain legal rights, correct?

[hedge_fun]

Motion to Vacate. Nice being able.....

to download directly off the new Hillsborough website.

https://www.scribd.com/document/333331689/MOTION-TO-VACATE-SFRX-v-Volentine

13. Mr. Kennedy lacks the requisite basis, foundation, and personal knowledge, and failed to present evidence showing otherwise, to testify as to the mindset of Mr. Volentine or to Mr. Volentine’s intentions as they relate to the posts offered in Plaintiff’s Exhibit A. In conformity with Fla. Stat. § 90.604, Mr. Kennedy should have never been allowed to speculate as to Mr. Volentine’s mindset or intentions.



90.604 Lack of personal knowledge.

Except as otherwise provided in s. 90.702, a witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced which is sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. Evidence to prove personal knowledge may be given by the witness’s own testimony.