Replies to post #551 on Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARMP)

[THREE-DAY-TRADER]

And so you see now why I've been objectively skeptical about this stock as its dropped down on us since first entry Nov 21, & for example; yesterday I noted .50 needed to hold more than 2 days before declaring better chance at a bottom and before doing any celebrating.
A trader always has to be objective regardless of any ownership of a stock in order to make best overall decisions for for ability to achieve profitable consistency.

In contrast to certain others here who post that tend to rationally spin things as overly positive, you see how much worse they are doing on APHB for entries (& in general for trading) compared to those of us who remain objective and hence analyze things more correcly for what they are.

And yeah, the Alert here on I-Hub for PSID resaly paid off for us a couple weeks ago, which helps allow for offsetting during times like this APHB trade.

[THREE-DAY-TRADER]

>>>You can also see this stock as a great example of my rule to follow on biotechs needing to have a minimum amount of cash burn ability. There were plenty who bought this in October @ 1+ area before they announced the cash offering in November, & those buyers since then are here yet today giving advice on this stock (LoL!).
I waited to enter after the share offering news in November because of one of my rules I always follow (that don't let me down) for cash on the on books, which APHB did not qualify for prior to November.
It's a good rule to strictly follow, so one doesn't get caught holding something that crashes after share offering news.
I told you that weeks ago about APHB. The cash raise that occurred in November shouldn't have been a surprise to any experienced trader. Its why avoided it, despite being tempted earlier at .80-1.00.