InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

gunnar

08/15/06 8:06 PM

#4956 RE: bocxman #4955

Well, good luck selling your shares if Abbott announces they are pulling the plug...

Of course there is no guarantee on this or any investment. This is a pink-sheet biotech for crying out loud. I think you're missing the point... which is, what is the best information we have as to the likely outcome at this point in time. Is it the company's press releases? The relative financial commitment made by Abbott (as an indicator of their risk/reward analysis)? The interest, or lack thereof, of other potential partners that have seen the technology?

Don't feel you need to answer, you and I have different approaches and therefore have different concerns. I absolutely do not want to be holding shares should any of your three 'sell' criteria come to pass... esp. if Abbott walks away.
icon url

mysscat

08/15/06 8:13 PM

#4957 RE: bocxman #4955

A pondering --- Why are board posters assuming BOCX can't intrigue another pharmaceutical Company? What I would assume is that the deal with Abbott is so sweet that other pharmas can't offer the same, thus it would be unfair to license RECAF at a lower rate.

Also, no news is good news. In one of the PR's Moro said that he's delighted to be working with Abbott on this project. I expect that is exactly what is happening. Wouldn't it be silly to license a technology and not use those who know the most about it in the integration into another platform?

I know that Moro, Gold, etc are world renown scientists. Their reputations are sterling. Why would they allow their good names to be involved in a scam? This is a major reason I get so fed up with some of these idiotic posts and posters. They slander these men who have been devoting their lives to trying to save us, our friends and relatives from the fear associated with thinking one has cancer.

Gees, give the guys a break. If you are so uncertain about the stock and are going to constantly ruminate about it. SELL.