InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

supersymmetry_ so32

08/15/06 5:11 PM

#118075 RE: mimurray #118073

We can settle this real quick by the T/A. do you know who they are?
icon url

Ranzy MD

08/16/06 9:20 AM

#118195 RE: mimurray #118073

REPOSTED POST BY MINMURRAY ON FINANCIAL BASHERS..NUFF SAID..MOFOS..

Believe me when I tell you cableguy I am not gonna have a heart attack. My totally absurd post was written using the same kind of fuzzy logic that you are using.

You must have forgotten what arena you are trading in. To suggest that what is written in the financials can't be trusted because it is not an official SEC filing is paranoid behavior. We are getting one hell of a lot more information than darn near any other pink sheet CEO provides. So far, everything SW has stated he has followed thru on. He wasn't hiding 2 billion shares and then "acting" like he was doing us a favor by doing a 600 million share buy back. We KNEW via information provided by a fellow board member here that there would be some additional dilution added to the 12 billion share figure stated in the last financial report. In fact SW even said it would be approximately 13 billion shares, and the reason why is that there were some CD shares converted BEFORE they reached an agreement with the CD holder placing it on hold for 18 months. And we knew ALL OF THIS before the financials were even released. So for you to suggest SW was pulling a fast one on us is just as absurd as my bull shit post was!!!! BTW...name another pink sheet stock that you know of that actually postponed a CD that was in place for a year and a half and in doing so told shareholders this would stop any further dilution. Just one, name JUST ONE.....I'll be waiting....

IN FACT, the O/S is slightly lower than what the financials state because we KNOW they bought back 608 million shares so far, but they only noted 600 million in the report.

I guess in a left handed sort of way what you say about the financials being unaudited and not officially filed with the SEC does mean that they are just that, unofficial. But to use that against the company is just being silly. They didn't have to give us ANYTHING AT ALL!!!!!!! You do realize that don't you????? I'll say it again, SW did not have to provide us ANY INFO AT ALL and if he had not given us any financials he would not have violated any rules becasue this is a PINK SHEET STOCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sometimes I think that the posters on this board don't have a logical thought in their body based on the things they write. Forget about SW and MG and The Fight Network. Think about the companies doing business with them. BIG NAME companies that CERTAINLY perform due dilligence before they get involved with another company, ANY COMPANY. CLEARLY they like what was presented to them and TRUST the information or they would not being doing business with us!!!!! Did you ever think about that?????????

I don't know if it's ignorance, or bashing, or just plain old trying to stir up shit that needn't be stirred up but your post was way off base. There was/is a totally logical explanation for EVERYTHING you questioned so by even suggesting what you did just REEKS of some unknown agenda. If there is in fact no unknown agenda being the driving force behind your post then you simply forgot that you are invested in a PINK SHEET STOCK and they DON'T HAVE TO GIVE US ANYTHING but they did....that speaks volumes to me about the intentions of this company!!!!

And BTW.....go tell all the people that owned stock in WCOM and ENRN that they are all okay and they really didn't lose anything at all because the CEO's of those corporations filed OFFICIAL REPORTS with the SEC!!!!!!!!!!

Good day sir!!!!!

icon url

cableguy

08/20/06 12:31 PM

#119182 RE: mimurray #118073

mimurry, sorry it took so long to respond as I had to research the data. Glad your not going to have a heartattack really...

Arena I'm trading in?? what do you want to fight me now??

To insinuate that unaudited financials create (parinoid behavior) Exhibiting or characterized by extreme and irrational fear, My post don't pose that meaning. disbelief disgruntled or perhaps distrust but not extreme irrational fear.

I don't care what you call it, I call it a smoke screen when a company tries to say they are going to buy back shares but yet still dilute.ha, IMO he should have waited to post the buy back. It just would have looked better.

You wanted me to post another campany that postponed & or cancelled CD's well here is one. (INSQ) http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_Sept_26/ai_n15630495

I concur, mimurry the company dosen't have to give us any financials, for that I applaud them in there efforts.

Oh & yes I still hold my core position.

good day to you to sir!!!!