Replies to post #279640 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[JJ1223]

itsabouttime  
Sunday, November 27, 2016 10:54:31 AM
Re: biopharm post# 279617
Post # of 279640 
In light of all of the knowledge being complied surrounding PS as a central player I would think the upside should be tremendous for many treatment regimens. Certainly all the potential partnership possibilities are beginning to come in view. If it is noticed by the investors. Then?

[Ku quote]Biopharm, I agree with everything you said. I just don't trust this management team. That is my only issue.[/quote]

All of the knowledge surrounding PS is part of the overall plan executed by this management team. With the tight patent rights owned totally by PPHM, all the research now coming to light was started because Peregrine put PS in play and spoke about it at conferences all over the world. Research by the scientific community designed to understand and verify. Credit will eventually come to light

[biopharm]

I can understand, but also try to give some benefit of the doubt to management due to resistance on many fronts over the years.

If Steve Worsley and Ramon Valencia and others all help in closing a deal ( a deal that may have already been started back in March 2014 ) over the next month or so, then great.

If no one can close a deal and this goes to a reverse split and THEN a deal closes.... I would not trust that "EVERYTHING" was done to get this back over a $1 before that time

If this does get back to close to $3+ in time and THEN reverse split STILL occurs.... "BEFORE" even bigger news appears then I still may not trust how things went (but at least they would have got it back to $3+ before that time...)

We certainly don't see all the cards behind the scenes, but Peregrine Pharmaceuticals may not also see them either.

I hope they go with making a few good deals vs trying to close a major deal with one BP (that may be concerned about 50% of the current shareholders that may be associated with another BP), because that single BP would have motives to try and steer PPHM into that reverse split.

Hopefully I am wrong and news can flow and we hit $3+ and NO NEED for that reverse split.

Of course for news to really flow, the PR must be written so all people understand... like those that buy marijuana stock that don't smoke marijuana will KNOW that next best stock is Immunotherapy stocks and the top one is PPHM, even those that don't follow Immunotherapy yet. Everyone knows someone that has/had cancer and Peregrine needs to hire a marketing writer or something because the only conclusion I draw from their last PR's is they are not ready for the price to run higher...yet.

The PR must explain Immunotherapy, the basics and written so the puzzle is clear in 3 paragraphs on why ALL will need PS Targeting.

[Protector]

ku, about the statement quoted:

I just don't trust this management team. That is my only issue.

Many posters have visited PPHM events or went to the Annual or possibly had the occasion to talk to BoD/Management and 3rd party researchers such as Dr. Brekken or consultants such as Dr. Garnick. (both last ones disclosed to be invested in PPHM by the way and are closely aware of what is happening at PPHM - which impacts their shares that just like ours are at 30 cent.).

The 'trust' issues could go away if you TALK ones yourselves with some of these people. That experience is ALWAYS worth MORE than WHATEVER Tam-Tam (Pro- or Con) here on the board. I have a reputation of being behind the BoD/Management and I have argued why that is where I am. So don't believe me because I have a PRO attitude. Others are on the CON side and should not be believed either.

If your investment in PPHM (if you are still invested) is undermined by a PPHM BoD trust issue and you want to stay in because as you posted you seem to believe like us in bavituximab, then, really, getting FIRST HAND contact is what you need.

And by the way, in case this may help you, this. All people over there are saying the SAME things. So if there would be a TRUST issue then ALL at PPHM (or at least those on the public forum) are IN! And I do NOT believe in a BoD/management planning kinky things with the complete staff included in the plan. For what it is worth coming from Leonardo :) to put it in your terms.