Replies to post #2135 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Theo]

Yep, and it looks like a 100K block at that. Probably happened near the close and had to be "pieced" together, ie., couple of smaller swaps to make the block an even 100K and then crossed out of sequence hence the time of 1602. Hey, JMO :)

Theo;-)