Support: 888-992-3836
Copyright © 2023 InvestorsHub Inc.
Replies to post #9891 on White Fox Ventures Inc. (AWAW)
clearmont88
11/12/16 7:46 AM
#9892 RE: moneysnip #9891
diannedawn
11/12/16 3:55 PM
#9894 RE: moneysnip #9891
deafelephant Saturday, 09/10/16 03:18:34 PM Post # of 34551 Multiple disputes with Seth M. Shaw: ROI Land Investments.... "Legal Matters On August 6, 2015, Mrs. Gloria Julie Couillard and Tekno Forme (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint naming CTC, its President, ROI DEV Canada (the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary), Philippe Germain and Sebastian Cliché as co-defendants claiming unpaid fees of $207,638. On September 2, 2015, a default judgement was served against CTC. CTC and its President are applying to set aside the default judgement against them and the Company is opposing the Plaintiff’s notice of Application. Because of the uncertainties as to outcome of the matter, no amounts have been recorded by the Company. On September 14, 2015, the Company received a notification from the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) of a Request for Mediation, dated September 8, 2015, filed by Seth Shaw, pursuant to a mediation and arbitration clause contained in a Consulting Agreement allegedly entered into between the Company and Seth Shaw on May 1, 2014. The Company executed such agreement but believes that it validly retracted it prior to any signature by Mr. Shaw personally. Mr. Shaw believes that the agreement is valid and in effect. The Company also believes that Seth Shaw failed to perform under said agreement, even if it were in effect. The matter under dispute is 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock which were to be issued to Mr. Shaw pursuant to such agreement. A certificate for such shares was issued but never delivered to Mr. Shaw, due to the retraction. In late September 2015, the Company offered to the AAA, and to counsel to Mr. Shaw, to voluntarily submit to mediation before the AAA, but not to arbitration, provided that the location of the mediation (which the Consulting Agreement does not specify) be in Montreal, where reside most of the Company’s management and many of the relevant witnesses. The Company has received no response to this offer, nor has it received any further communication from counsel to Mr. Shaw since September. In mid-October, attorneys for Mr. Shaw unilaterally attempted to induce the Company’s transfer agent to issue a replacement certificate. However, the transfer agent reported this to the Company, and the Company has instructed the transfer agent not to comply with Mr. Shaw’s wishes. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself from any claims by Mr. Shaw for such shares." Comstock Mining: "The State Court Case On November 9, 2004, we filed a lawsuit in Maricopa County (Arizona) Superior Court against defendants Stephen B. Parent, Ron Haswell, Walter Doyle, Seth Shaw, Antonio Treminio, together with their spouses, and Ecovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation, or Ecovery. The 12-count complaint alleges claims for violations of Arizona’s racketeering act, state-law securities fraud (primary and secondary liability), common-law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence/gross negligence, breach of contract, unjust enrichment/restitution, theft/conversion, conspiracy liability, and injunctive relief. In essence, the complaint alleges that Stephen Parent misrepresented the value of certain placer mining claims that his company, Ecovery, sold to us in 2003 in exchange for approximately 99,000,000 shares of our stock; that Ecovery no longer had good title to the mining claims when they were sold to us; that Mr. Parent and the other named defendants conspired to defraud us out of approximately 24,000,000 shares of our stock; and that Mr. Parent misappropriated more than $300,000 in company funds." Goldspring, Inc "GOLD HILL, Nev., June 26, 2006 (PRIMEZONE) -- GoldSpring, Inc. (OTCBB:GSPG) announced today that it has reached a settlement with Seth Shaw, one of the main defendants in the Company's Arizona Superior Court lawsuit, against several defendants, including its founder, Steve Parent. Pursuant to an Order from the Maricopa County Superior Court, the parties and their respective counsel met on June 20, 2006 with a mediator. After lengthy negotiations, the Company agreed to settle its claims against Mr. Shaw pursuant to, among others, the following binding terms: 1) immediate payment by Mr. Shaw to GoldSpring of $75,000 in cash; 2) dismissal by GoldSpring of the pending litigation against Mr. Shaw with prejudice; 3) agreement that the settlement shall in no way be construed as an admission of liability or fault on the part of Mr. Shaw; and 4) mutual releases by each of Goldspring and Shaw to the other from liability related to the pending lawsuit. In discussing this success in the litigation, Rob Faber, President and CEO of GoldSpring, stated, "We believe this is a fair settlement on terms which materially benefit the Company, and we are hopeful that we will satisfactorily resolve the balance of this pending litigation in the near future.""
Monday, 09/12/16 07:45:52 AM Re: deafelephant post# 33141 Post # of 34551 Sethie boy also had a legal dispute with Seafarer over shares.... I posted the details here before... Quote: Is this a TRUE statement? Sethie Quote: Quote: First of all, back in 2004, I was named in a civil lawsuit (the only time in my career) that was frivolous. It resulted from a fight between the outgoing management team and incoming management team. I wonder? Cuz I know that you were President and CEO of Organetix... http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1106213/000114420408011968/xslF345X02/v104671_ex.xml You were also the principle financial and accounting officer http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1106213/000136110608000131/organetix_10q-033108.htm and then Organetix did a RM with Seafarer... http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1106213/000136110608000176/organetix_8k-060408.htm That was in June of 2008... and in June of 2013, Seafarer filed a lawsuit against a "Seth Shaw" "Case Summary Case No. 13-CA-008467 Seafarer Exploration, Corp. vs Seth Shaw" and THAT "Seth Shaw" was represented by no other than "Defendant Shaw, Seth PAUL K SILVERBERG, Esquire Retained 954-384-0998(W)" Isn't that the very same Attorney representing TAUG??? Now I do not know WHAT the case was about... Unfortunately, the case docs are not on PACER. It does say that it was "Case Type: Securities Litigation"