InvestorsHub Logo

suerte88

11/11/16 3:47 AM

#2196 RE: itsallgood11 #2195

If the burnrate is still 300k, then 4,271,000 should be enough for roughly 14 month. If there is more income from TLC-2000 side, it could be even longer. Wasn't 6,000,000 planed to be raised? This means less dilution as planned

MasterSalix

11/11/16 7:48 AM

#2198 RE: itsallgood11 #2195

You can really look at it two ways. On one hand less dilution - less dilution should be positive for share price short term.

However, on the other hand they raised less money which means two things - they will likely have to do this again AND even when they give away the store and undercut the market at like 30%, they can't garner enough interested investors to get it fully subscribed.

For me, the second point is troubling. The fact that they weren't maxed in the offering means that folks are worried about how this fund-draw relates to the previous one and, now, the impending subsequent one - and whether TLT will ultimately have the money to make it through trials at all. This is quickly becoming for me instead of a LT hold a "sell the pops" play - and that sucks because I really like the tech and promise, but the share structure is quickly becoming less than attractive....