TexasBoston: so hydroslotter and schlumberger are on site and working then? specifically Grimes three and four as announced? They have been reiterating this for some time, but the pr wording and timeline(s) suggests otherwise, and therefore is subject to contention.
Consider the pr put out before it was learned of the Montana shallow wells how long ago? I believe there have been a few other pr's regarding the grimes property since then and the confusion created seeds doubt and suspicion.
As far as number one, reporting non-existant gas flows to investor base would be a big no-no and I imagine a regulatory commission exists for such things. I expect that number one and two will continue to have ongoing glitches here and there which is pretty standard in O&G production. We accept that, but still have questions regarding the status of workovers for three and four, plus future workover plans have not been solidified in the minds of some....thats all.
While we may not be able to put a finger on it, somethings do not seem to add up as outlined in pr's. We seek clarification, which in most cases is not forthcoming nor encouraging when speaking with Dale.
Your post confirms that Dale is aware of the post(s) you mentioned and who did he posting. It goes to show then, it is not unreasonable to assume he has gone over the posts of late regarding his competance and integrity.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
