InvestorsHub Logo

Diamondhands45

11/07/16 6:43 PM

#23864 RE: animaljive #23862

How did you find that out? That would be inside info that a shareholder would not be privileged to know and that a CEO would be jailed for sharing

brando5

11/07/16 10:06 PM

#23869 RE: animaljive #23862

That's false and pretty hilarious Mr know it all full of BS what a load of bs. Think were idiots?

work-n-hard

11/08/16 9:15 AM

#23885 RE: animaljive #23862

animaljive, I'm sure nobody would tell you that I have been a big supporter of the ticker. (I've flipped it 3 times.)
However, I don't believe in keeping quite when information is incorrect. (Intentionally or not)
If you would read the patent application submitted by PB, it would appear to be in conflict with what you are posting.
Maybe it's semantics, terminology or just a lack of medical knowledge on my part?
But they have been working with mice and this even shows where they bought them from. You can skip about 80% of the way down to results to see the text that states the word "mice".

http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=(%22Felder%3B+Mitchell+S%22.IN.)&OS=IN/%22Felder;+Mitchell+S%22&RS=IN/%22Felder;+Mitchell+S%22


People tend to believe what someone else posts when you can provide a link.
GLTA