InvestorsHub Logo

ICEMAN1CO

08/13/06 2:17 AM

#252 RE: zagdad #251

Zagdad

Uhmmm lets take these one at a time shall we..........

Item-1"Think about it - you are planning to merge but waiting on certain things to happen, like the move to the BB (done),"

***The "MOVE" to the BB was REINSTATEMANT to the BB...not an accomplishment..infact it apparently set them back and shed a negative light on the Company for being DELISTED in the first place.......

Item-2 "the launch of the product (likely done but unannounced), the filing of the 14C (likely submitted - awaiting response)"

*** Lets stick with the Facts at this point shall we, Neither of the above has been announced and untill it is..it is just a PLAN TOO...In addition to that the PR said it was "under Review"...NOT SUBMITTED...Pure Speculation on your part...

Item-3 "and AHM has already announce the intent to bring cash (BIG bucks) to the deal for operations - hmmm"

***Hmmmm? Then why in the Main Elements of the LOI is ETLC REQUIRED to PAY AHM shareholders $3 Million Dollars and give them up to 152 Million shares of ETLC stock? That is Per a PR ETLC issued in which ETLC is the SOURCE? You seem to be confused on who is Bringing BIG BUCKS to the DEAL...Not my words....ETLC words...Shall I repost the PR from ETLC for you?

Item-4 "Wow, maybe there are correspondence courses that cover this basic stuff..."

*** The Rest of your post was speculation and that last comment.........well......I used the information from ETLC...the information they made public.....the Filing.....the missing AHM information from recent pr's from ETLC..........all verifiable.....Good luck to you zagdad...consider your BASIC correspondence course completed....You FAILED.........jmho