InvestorsHub Logo

PADRINO

11/02/16 3:20 PM

#52887 RE: Phil34653 #52886

It all depends on the company. I was in a ticker that went current recently, took over a month for it to show up on OTC markets... when it does though, we will run... IMHO

Zorax

11/02/16 7:28 PM

#52890 RE: Phil34653 #52886

Well, I only looked at icty for a frontloaded flip and fake promotion momo I thought was going to happen. It still may.
Otherwise, with a semi thorough check/research, my humble opinion is icty is just a run of the mill share selling scam.
October has been looking like a big front load session and why I'm pissed scottrade won't let me buy. Also, scottrade looks at this kind of trading action and tries to control their risk by keeping cash accounts like mine from joining the move.

Sorry, and here's a few reasons for my opinion, far from professional that it is.
Non filer with the SEC, deregistered way back in 2008. This recent opinion letter (which plenty of so-called lawyers have been getting in trouble about lately) has a couple of red flags which I 'flagged in red'. Unaudited of course.

Also, it would have been much more convincing to actually bring (almost) all their fin's up with the SEC instead of the meaningless OTCM. Doing all this work just last month with those years looks to be just a facade for a big awareness campaign perhaps developing in the near future. There truly is no reason to bring fin's up to date just for the OTCM. EDIT- Actually, there is a big reason to 'act' like your fin's are up to date - if the ceo is prepping for a huge awareness campaign in the near future. I expect it now upon thinking about this 'filing' ploy scenario. Because the job of the awareness campaigns is to attempt to create a volume or interest in the stock for the clients (ceo and pals) to sell into. Don't forget that almost 100% of the time, officers and insiders get company stock absolutely free, so they can sell it into oblivion higher than 5 digits. Because even a pps of .00005 makes them money on their free shares.

And what better story than to state you just worked your ass off getting 5 years of fins up to date? Except for the trivial fact that it wasn't with the SEC which is official and holds the company accountable as well, but with the bogus OTCM. Oh, yea, very soon there will be at least a 3 day P&D.
And scottrade won't let me buy the damn thing...lol
Mark this post.


Lanham & Lanham, LLC
A Professional Law Firm
October 6, 2016
OTC Markets Group, Inc.
304 Hudson Street, Second Floor
New York, New York 10013
RE: Attorney Letter with Respect to Adequate Current Information of EyeCity.com, Inc.
(the “Issuer”) for the years ended December 31, 2012 through 2015 and all subsequent quarters ended March 31, June 30 and
September 30 for those respective years.

The opinions and conclusions contained in this Letter are based upon the information and facts made available to Counsel, and are solely based on the accuracy of such Information and facts. Further, Counsel has reviewed all prior disclosures, as amended, (the “Prior Disclosures”) posted by the Issuer with the OTC News Service. All such Prior Disclosures are believed to be accurate and reliable. In the event that the Information, facts, and Prior Disclosures are determined not to be true, this Letter is rescinded and to be deemed null and void. Counsel has discussed the above Information, Prior Disclosures, and the underlying assumptions Counsel is relying upon, with the management of the Issuer.
The financial statements of the Issuer are not audited.
The financial statements were prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
The financials were prepared internally by the Issuer’s management, who participated in the gathering of the Information for the Issuer’s financial statements, who have a background in accounting and have reviewed the Issuer’s unaudited financial statements and reports as published
with OTC Markets
.--Published with the OTCM NOT the SEC