Not a chance pal. See here's the thing, unlike certain naive, ignorant investors that post pretty pictures on Twitter, I actually know this space, and have done my homework.
Let me give you an example why I will take that bet: drivers. If you read that and thought "cars?" don't invest in Sphere. There is a reason (one of many) the Corel Glassware solution failed. Glassware had no driver support, thus users could not print. All these printers and peripherals that people use daily require software drivers, and that takes coding talent. Coding talent and resources Sphere has never had. How critical is this task, and how big? At one time, almost half of VMware's development resources were dedicated writing and supporting device drivers. Thats a LOT of resources.
Want another reason? Active Directory integration. At best, what Glassware offers is a kludge requiring additional work on the part of IT desktop and security admins. These are the same people that would test, evaluate and recommend deployment of Glassware. Do you think that these IT staff want more work? Do you think they want a less secure solution? Especially when that have options from Microsoft, VMware, Dell, Citrix, IBM and others that work, and are successfully installed and running?
Never going to happen.
Also, let's not forget that no enterprise security team will deploy a solution that offers no data encryption capabilities. And per Peter Bookman and John Morelli, Glassware does not have encryption.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
