No such documentation is needed or relevant. It is an indisputable FACT that the government took over both GSEs and there is no credible information to allege this was unintended or accidental. And the only information in any of the documents being sought by plaintiffs could only prove the takeover was intentional.
Why can't you just make a rare admission that the document discovery has nothing to do with the claims in Fairholme? I don't see that as asking so very much.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
