Replies to post #318677 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[Bentobox]

Quid pro quo and lots of pleading the 5th. With the patents intact (60+) and no debt I would say there could have been a high valuation. I am not sure I believe War Machine or any of you for that matter but if "hypothetically" there was no debt and the patents intact as I stated above this would be/could be quite valuable in my opinion. Without everything intact (1 or more/anything) there also would be a valuation which I have no means of finding out at his time. I am not sure as to what they own but do know if YA does own "everything" they have done a very sloppy job i.e. Copy/paste etc. It is a vacuous situation in my opinion.

[Be Confident]

Bento,

I feel relatively certain the shareholders who received checks were the debt holders (those who held debentures). There were nine in total as I recall.

Also, you may find it relevant that YA distributed its debentures among the new debt holders approximately 2 years prior to the last r/s, and ALL of them converted their debentures at the identical rate, such that each of them owned and maintained the identical 9.9% common shares as the O/S grew (the O/S grew with each conversion). All of this had been specifically orchestrated as part of an original agenda. NM, LLC had been incorporated back in 2007! While this doesn't necessarily mean its original purpose was to sell off the patents, it certainly plays well to this theme.

As for the number of shareholders required to force a filing, you are spot on. The number is 500, and the company must also have revenues of $10M (which I feel certain they do...yet merely my opinion).

I also agree that it appears the company remains operating in the dark.

Now a special question:
Would you have a list of the property which remains listed to Neom?

All of the above...JMO.

Best,
BC

[Poptech]

bent: What?

"There is still property listed to Neoemedia Tenchnologies Inc. updated as recently as 10/25/2016."

Where is this list?