InvestorsHub Logo

brownshark12

10/26/16 9:34 PM

#357514 RE: big-yank #357512

please provide a link big-yank

cooler_heads

10/26/16 9:38 PM

#357515 RE: big-yank #357512

Man.....dam us.

montecristo

10/26/16 9:49 PM

#357519 RE: big-yank #357512

75 of that is Sweeney's motion to compel.

Gov't argument is light on case references vs. Sweeney's.


Patswil

10/26/16 10:31 PM

#357523 RE: big-yank #357512

The Edwards Plaintiffs tell Judge Moreno there's nothing for him to do because the case has concluded and he has no jurisdiction to do anything further. The Edwards Plaintiffs suggest that Judge Moreno should also cancel the hearing he scheduled for Oct. 31."

http://gselinks.com/Court_Filings/PWC/16-cv-21224-0053.pdf

EAT IT!!!!!

Donotunderstand

10/27/16 10:00 AM

#357553 RE: big-yank #357512

why are you not busy 110% of the time practicing law at 1000 bucks an hour?

you note that the plaintiffs in Fairholme should never have used to discover - since they could have blown away the GOV other ways you know about but never explain

now you say the GOV writ of mandamus could have been avoided - as if your saying it is fact in and of itself - without showing one step of such process

seriously - if you know as fact all the tactics that our attorneys are making in error and the tactics and use of the law they should have used --- you should be practicing law at 1000 an hour

and you (and I) are not