So you are saying that Fairholme is meddling in another case, attempting to stall any decision in the Roberts litigation until the Perry Appeal gets handed down? Wouldn't that tend to validate Mr. Sammons claim that things are getting dragged out? Couldn't this lead to an intercession being filed in the Perry Appeal by a shareholder who is tired of and scared by the endless legal jostling over documents and discovery? Wouldn't a dismissal by Judge Chang be reviewable under appeal if later information surfaced that contra-indicated such a decision, making any delaying action unnecessary? Wouldn't a favorable ruling to hear Roberts by Judge Chang be favorable to plaintiffs in many pending actions? Why delay?
Something smells bad here.
Please clarify what you meant by "getting roberts by the perry capital appeal".
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
