Replies to post #33840 on QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[mr_sano]

Confirmed efficacy does not confirm anything if you don't know what they are it comparing to. If the device reduced viscosity (it will temporarily because of the addition of heat caused by current running through the the oil medium) then they can say yes it showed efficacy.. the effect may not last or only works at 1/10th the flow but they can report it as "confirmed efficacy" . This the typical word play this company is used to spinning. Problem is now, even the most dire hard investors are weary of this constant fabrication of half truths.

I think all have learned that Qsep management has spun tales about its products since its inception. Nothing has changed. Tao, the principal inventor, has never fielded any commercial equipment that has been duplicated and bought by industry. The biggest accomplishment aside from AOT is the mars chocolate mover which no one has heard much of since!

[zerosum]

I agree Smile, the technology works and it will sell. I think we see adoption and sales.

Furthermore, as we have now definitively confirmed through commercial pipeline installations and the SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) records we have collected as well as crude oil samples we have analyzed in the Temple laboratory, the value engineered AOT has documented efficacy across the full spectrum of grades of crude oil, from super heavy bitumen to super lightweight and ultralight condensates.


definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy
definitively confirmed efficacy

So no longer is the word proven strong enough