Replies to post #45726 on New Generation Consumer Group Inc (NGCG)

[I-Glow]

I find it pretty funny - that since no one can produce any facts to support that NGCG is a scam - the last resort is to attack his grammar - which if anyone read it - it was well written.

So you think the second sentence is (run on) - that isn't close to being accurate.

I am happy to share and sorry if YOU couldn't find them. Wow !

* For a CEO of a publicly traded company, one would think a good proofread would be in order ?

My intentions is to keep (I WOULD USE ARE)

It is a business I am very passionate about and have a great deal of experience. (HUH ? RUN ON)

No promises but I hope I can complete the deal before I leave to Hong Kong. (I WOULD USE LEAVE FOR)

That is it - for 5 paragraphs - this is the attack on Kim. Now that is funny.

I guess when there isn't any facts to support Kim being involved in a scam - the only thing left is to attack his grammar - it actually seems very well written - maybe written very quickly.

At least everyone understands that the attacks on Kim are unfounded.

IG