That's nice. The funny thing about law is the following;
1.there are numerous and volumes of precedent that don't support that ruling as well
2. Again it's one ruling and his decision was not predicated on the destruction of software patents as you seem to want to imply, rather it was a nonsensical rant. Thus, Scotus is more likely to look into it.
3. Sadly, again for the anti patent crowd, software is still patentable according to LAW. Those with law degrees (unable or unallowed) to practice, and even those without law degrees are aware of this.
Too bad so sad!