InvestorsHub Logo

TTommy

10/14/16 12:30 PM

#43256 RE: Charvey #43255

The answers will only

be known and made public if legal proceedings are initiated in both directions. Any corporate holds the first position with SS and his news letter taking the second slot. Nothing can be resolved until such time that complaints are filed imo.

Not rocket science just a bunch of hucksters preying on the investing public. Both ANY corporate and SS should be held accountable for the hit and run.

derek32smith

10/14/16 12:37 PM

#43257 RE: Charvey #43255

Seriously?

Lets consider some facts. First, he presented himself as an expert on technology? And when pressed about his claims about Microsoft, he said his source was Microsoft itself. When he claimed in his Pondering Primate blog that Glassware was the "only way to end end of life " and "run ATM based XP apps in the cloud" he was forced to delete it. And forced by Microsoft.

Now, let me ask you where he got his information if he wasn't technically competent, and didn't get his info from Microsoft? And why did Sphere represent his musings regularly on their web site?

Why did has writings and tweets almost exactly match the storyline being promoted by Sphere throughout the promotion? Why did he have unique access to Sphere exec Tassiopoulos? Who started the ANY board on this forum? Who was the only independent investor and writer ever to ask a question on the quarterly calls?

Who wrote the glowing executive backgrounds that claimed Sphere exec Nilesh Patel was a founder of NetApp, and Bookman a founder of Fusion IO? (Note: with joined their respective companies 2-4 years AFTER the companies were formed).

C'mom guys. Think about it. Do you really think he was truly independent?