Replies to post #67300 on Nate's Food Company (NHMD)

[jimwalters]

Completely unproven bs that would not hold up in a court of law

The power of the subpoena would most likely lead to it being proven in a court of law starting with trading records, fraudulent PRs/8Ks, and long history of fleecing investors for personal gain.

[Sheepdog]

You are correct. That is why it is a good scam.

Maybe someone can tell me why shareholders are paying Nate $7.5M or so to use "Nate's Homemade®" instead of the (free) "Nate's Homemade TM" or "Nate's Homemade SM" on the can when the shareholders derive the same benefit without having to pay for the worthless (at time of conception) name at all?

Any value attached to this name was paid for and will be paid for by the investors, NOT NATE:

A scam from the beginning.