shorthound, you've been here a long time and I respect your opinions but you also bring up more questions with your answers. Like what % of couples would a Dr tell them they need IVF rather than invocell due to their "situation"? Is it only 5 to 10%, and what keeps a couple from qualifying for invocell? Is it a medical reason or just their preference? I keep hearing insurance references. A person having insurance today does not mean the same as it did 20 years ago. Back in the day, having insurance meant you paid practically nothing, now you pay very significantly out of your own pocket. I can see Invocell clinics opening as competition to IVF and as long as they can medically help a large % of couples and its half the price, it saves insurance companies and individuals money. I would like to hear more on specific situations from a medical perspective where IVF would have to be used over Invocell. Does anyone here know that answer?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
