How is a stay favorable to a shareholder?
clearly, Sammons has an ulterior motive if he affects an outcome you mention (also preponderance of evidence suggests this is what you wish for).
a mole.
it is also interesting how you imply that sammons and defendants have a shared motive.
"The U.S. could not file such an appeal because it never raised jurisdiction, but would fare better by letting Sammons take the lead on this."
wonder what other shareholders (fairholme, paraglia, perry) think of this.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
