InvestorsHub Logo

Snowy_Owl

10/07/16 5:22 PM

#160957 RE: rr50 #160956

Burn!

Page 3 - Footnote 2 "The pseudonym used by the anonymous short seller in this case is “Mako Research,” not “the Pump Stopper.” Defendants do not know why Plaintiff would attribute the posting at issue to a different anonymous short seller"

MinnieM

10/07/16 5:58 PM

#160959 RE: rr50 #160956

What a great response! Thanks for posting the link here. ;)





In Reply to 'rr50'
Sullivan Filing
http://ia801507.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.447344/gov.uscourts.nysd.447344.69.0.pdf



JTORENCE

10/07/16 7:18 PM

#160965 RE: rr50 #160956

My guess Rosen comes away with nothing more than a warning and a slap on the wrist. Hope I am wrong-Mark this post..

Phoenix300

10/07/16 8:35 PM

#160970 RE: rr50 #160956

Mr. Sullivan....this Texan tips his hat!

Good work sir.
Job well done.
Thank you.
Go CTIX

stevo99

10/07/16 9:52 PM

#160975 RE: rr50 #160956

This is my favorite line in Sullivan's filing..."The reasonable attorney’s fees at issue here do not even begin to compensate the Defendants for the harm caused by the decision to file a class action lawsuit based purely on a story on the internet by an anonymous author who, in all likelihood, was involved in securities fraud." Nail him to the wall!!!