InvestorsHub Logo

jabberstox

08/09/06 9:42 PM

#2680 RE: midas716 #2678

totally agree with that.....it needs more liquidity but when the 10q comes out and if it has some tremendous things in it....you wont be able to chase shares down.....it will move to fast.....and I would hate to miss out on what I think is a company with great potential as oil move toward $100 per barrel or more......more and more awareness to a stock like this imo

lowman

08/09/06 10:52 PM

#2692 RE: midas716 #2678

Midas, half of what you say is true, the other half is pure opinion, and quite honestly, BS!

I'll agree the hype is too much. I'm not going to stop anyone from being bullish though. That's not the nature of a Long.

To suggest that the stock MUST go lower is about as deep of cow dung as it gets.

If investors simply quit selling, be it at .10 or .12 or .15, and shorts see a solid bottom, they will cover and be gone. It does NOT need to go to the levels you are gunning for.

Yes, you own shares, and Donald Trump is my apprentice. See! I can lie, too.

Now, it makes me curious how an expert chart reader such as you, all of the sudden popped up on IHub, with all your amazing experience. Hmmm...you almost appear to me as a MM yourself. Experienced...manipulating the stock towards more of a downtrend, no true sign off bullishness. Hmmm...

Given your 'experience', it is obvious you are playing WWEN like a fiddle. With all your 'chart knowledge', I find it literally impossible you would still hold shares (even one share) if you KNEW WWEN was going down. Plain and simple. Human nature. Cut and dried! Lie all you want...I'm not buying!

Seeing how 'intelligent' you are, and quick to advise us, your intelligence would contradict itself to hold shares in a devaluating company, it is therefore 100% certain you are 'at play' again, manipulating present shareholders with your Almighty knowledge, purporting the pps must go down. Of course! How else could you re-load, if the pps does not go down?

Yes, you are VERY good, perhaps at reading charts, but just as much so at manipulating people with your NEAR perfect spin.

It may work with the masses, but it doesn't work with me.

My condolences to anyone who buys into your well contrived innuendo.

BTW I DO own the Brooklyn Bridge!





lowman

08/09/06 11:08 PM

#2693 RE: midas716 #2678

"IMO this stock would be better off for the true longs if they had 300 to 500 million O/S"

LMFRAO!!! I have never heard something so friggin stupid! I hardly even know how to respond!

Yeah, right! You would just love your short position to be diluted to high heaven down to .001.

Take a look at CTUM and it's low float. Look at the 6 mo chart and tell me the low float has hurt it!

A larger float is not the answer. Developments are the answer. The more longs that hold, the easier it is for a low float to rise rapidly and easily, and as in CTUM's case today, with 25% gains, on NO NEWS!

Midas, you really blew your cork on that one. Perhaps we should all start posting "big float" instead of "low float" to attract investors, eh? You crack me up, but then, like you said, "IMO".

IMO, you're quickly losing credence.