Replies to post #355590 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[whipstick]

No that's actually the opposite of what I said. I didn't point to some numbered statute because that doesn't really matter. What matters is the means they employed to justify their ends, which the auditors signed off on.

By signing off on those they implicated themselves. I'm not saying it's fair and maybe they were pressured to do so but they signed off none the less because that's their job.

I'm adopting the former CFO's stance that the now un-privileged documents will be also damning to the auditor's case as well.

Also - it's hilarious that you're riding high on your horse and attempting to turn the tables back on me, sorry I had to drop knowledge bombs on you.

Further, I still don't understand why you insist on being overtly negative in the face of very good news for YOUR preferred position.. something doesn't line up there does it Mr Yank?

[rekcusdo]

Your a pretty good lawyer yourself!

When the rules don't exist to counter your point, you insist that matters. When they do exist to counter your point, you insist they don't matter.

[Donotunderstand]

not scared

but simply very wisely pragmatic

State courts are not bound by the HERA judicial castration

Period