InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JusticeWillWin

10/05/16 11:23 AM

#355079 RE: big-yank #355071

Is this against me or the original timhoward717.com article I've linked? I've only copied the headline and added a link to the article. It is not my opinion that BO is definitely involved personally, even if it is quite possible.
icon url

Zmarzz

10/05/16 11:47 AM

#355084 RE: big-yank #355071

I think there is another aspect of Judge Sweeney's ruling that may be even more important in the long run.
In my opinion, it is now very likely that Judge Sweeney or another judge will approve the release of government documents dating back to the federal takeover of FnF in 2008. We will learn why the government expected massive losses (that never happened); that is to say, we will find out exactly how the econometric models were designed that gave these inaccurate forecasts. I suspect that the models were M_A_N_I_P_U_L_A_T_E_D to project losses so huge that the federal government seemingly had no choice but to take control.
icon url

rekcusdo

10/05/16 11:53 AM

#355087 RE: big-yank #355071

Agreed.

There is no evidence that Obama was involved as of yet and a person who makes such unfounded accusations is clearly biased.
icon url

yambike

10/05/16 1:23 PM

#355122 RE: big-yank #355071

R.U saying protecting govt officials from defamation and hiding their actions is more important than the citizen's right to know? cuz that's what it sounds like you're saying, yank.

where in the constitution does it say that?
icon url

MATT6929

10/05/16 2:02 PM

#355135 RE: big-yank #355071

Again another joke of a post. What some guy wrote on the internet matters very little.