InvestorsHub Logo

waterchaser

10/04/16 9:52 AM

#250900 RE: Hammer1 #250899

Just more PnD fluff. Nothing "huge" of course.

2014shelby

10/04/16 11:02 AM

#250904 RE: Hammer1 #250899

GRCU PPS dropping

I-Glow

10/04/16 12:27 PM

#250909 RE: Hammer1 #250899

Hmmm, that name (Andrew Pitsicalis) rings a bell - let me think and I will see what I can come up with.

He and Leon Hendrix lost a court battle with Janie hendrix:

CONCLUSION

I agree with the majority that we should reverse the district court’s ruling that the WPRA is unconstitutional. I also concur in the affirmance of the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to Experience Hendrix on its infringement claims against Pitsicalis’s use of the “Hendrix” marks. I concur in the vacatur and remand of the permanent injunction. I join the majority in reversing the district court’s decision to decrease the damages awarded by the jury. I also join the majority’s vacatur of the attorney fee award. I differ from the majority in that I would NOT remand for a new trial on damages. I would remand for reinstatement of the damages awarded by the jury, and for an award of attorney’s fees to Experience Hendrix as the prevailing party. In short, the district court should reinstate the jury ’s verdict, award attorney’s fees to Experience Hendrix, and let this case be done.

The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court overturned the District Court rulings that were ballyhooed in this press release: http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/jimi-hendrixs-brand-lives-via-landmark-joint-venture-licensing-deal-between-the-laroda-1674709.htm

If you had read the court documents you would understand that Leon Hendrix would have to license the Jimi Hendrix name through Janie Hendrix and Experience Hendrix.

You do know that Hendrixlicensing.com and Andrew Pitsicalis had to pay damages to Janie Hendrix and Experience Hendrix for Trademark infringement.

GRCU has tried to use Pitsicalis to pump the stock in 2015 and it failed just as it will fail this time.

IG