Replies to post #13936 on Double Crown Resources Inc. (fka DDCC)

[DragonBear]

Double Crown receiving the patent on the Translock system does effectively create a monopoly for the interlocking type container

Except for the separate patent owned, and used by Portare&Synergy. Where not only do they have their own patent, but also a manufactured product on the market since 2014. Not a monopoly of anything - is it?

Reality

Goog, and go to the Portare website. One will see a whole line of modular intermodal containers advertised.

Meanwhile the Microcrap scam DDCC has a patent with no means of ever manufacturing anything by itself. DDCC is functionally BK (ref: see last 10Q). A patent no intermodal manufacturer is interested in licensing. No 8K filed to indicate otherwise.

[ProfitScout]

Double Crown's patent 9,428,330 on the interlocking type container does give this company an effective monopoly on the technology. It is to Double Crown's credit that they were able to achieve full patent status so quickly over all competing designs. There is no question now who shippers and container manufacturers will have to deal with for licensing rights, whether they want to use the Translock's advanced features in their own containers or simply build the Translock design in its entirety. Either way, Double Crown is the only company that can market this technology now that the patent protection is in place.