My later guess is that Cede came from a very small footnoted item in Sammons letter. I am increasingly of the opinion that he is just a disgruntled, frustrated investor. I also think he implies he owns $1 M, not one million shares, for whatever relevance that implies.
As Sweeney notes, neither plaintiffs or defense ever raised objections to her court's jurisdiction, so I find the "government mole" opinions hard to fathom. And the government would not intercede with a "pro se" claim in any circumstance.
JMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
