You'll see. You'll see. Have fun watching others make large profits ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$). You should be hearing this in about 3-6 months (maybe sooner) "I TOLD YOU SO". I will be LMAO. Cha Ching!
Finding a patent lawyer's site with the same discussion wasn't that difficult via a Goog search.
DDCC had 9 months up front once the USPO started the patent review on Oct 2015.
And yes we have already debunked DDCC's patent has been licensed - where's the 8K? Or that any imaginary intermodal manufacturer would have a unique product if they licensed the patent.
Another debunk is that even if DDCC could find a intermodal manufacturer, that the revenue stream of royalties would add up to million$$$ for DDCC. DDCC claims to have licensed their previous container system at 0.75% royalty, and the revenues in the last filing was $8250 for the first 9 months of 2015 in the last 10Q before going delinquent in the filings. About what would be expected for a 0.75% royalty. Also not enough to cover -$1.4M in losses during the same time period. Unclear why there is this repeated claim that million$$$ would role in, as though the royalty was 99%.
The December 31, 2015 annual is delinquent more and more as the months pass by. Usually when an issuer goes delinquent on a 10K is due to non-payment.
Auditors cannot release the Audit Report until full payment. Rarely do issuers go delinquent on an interim report, because the issuer is not obligated to pay in full for a review.
So it is clear as day, it is more important to pay for luxury car and housing allowance for management instead of in the interest of shareholders and pay for the audit expense.
Don't forget the company paid vacation to South America.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
