InvestorsHub Logo

yambike

09/30/16 10:47 AM

#354568 RE: big-yank #354564

I'll settle for your govt contacts going to jail. maybe et tu?

Potty

09/30/16 10:55 AM

#354572 RE: big-yank #354564

Mr.Yank, and what about if the Appeals court reverses Lamberth's decision? Or sends the case back to the Lamberth court with strict conditions on how to move forward?

You do not think that will light the case up in the media and give a lot of impetus to the Government to settle?

I really, really am interested in seeing how the House of Representatives is going to react to evidence that the Obama Administration explicitly discussed using FNMA/FMCC revenues to pay for Obamacare, ACA etc. when the Congress would not sanction funds for that.

Would Hensaerling be interesting in hearings on THAT? Settlement would a lot better than that...

rekcusdo

09/30/16 11:02 AM

#354576 RE: big-yank #354564

A receivership would never be set in motion.

It is naive to believe the government would be that stupid.

Why give up their piggy bank? They would rather continue to take for eternity.