InvestorsHub Logo

JG305

09/27/16 1:12 PM

#106443 RE: LOVE*PINK #106439

Online Media Group (the writer of this advertisement you reference) doesn't seem to be very transparent in its disclosure.

...we call the reader's attention to the fact that Online Media Group, Inc. has received compensation from the company mentioned in this report.



Some investment newsletters claim to be sources of unbiased information, when in fact the newsletter publisher will make a lot of money if the newsletter convinces investors to buy or sell particular stocks. Do not take comfort because a newsletter encourages you to purchase or sell a stock through your own brokerage account. Even if you do not give the newsletter publisher any money to place trades for you, the newsletter publisher may profit from your trading activity. For example, you may purchase a stock (causing the stock price to rise) and then the newsletter publisher may sell its shares of that stock (profiting at your expense).

If a newsletter promotes a particular stock, read carefully what the newsletter says about compensation it receives and look for these red flags:

No disclosures. Be suspicious if the newsletter does not disclose having received any compensation.

Vague disclosures. Be skeptical of newsletters that do not specifically disclose who paid them, the amount, and the type of payment. The following examples raise red flags because they do not contain specific information:

"From time to time, the Newsletter may receive compensation from companies we write about."

"From time to time, the Newsletter or its officers, directors, or staff may hold stock in some of the companies we write about."

"The Newsletter receives fees from the companies we write about."

Buried disclosures. Be wary if the newsletter’s disclosures are difficult to find or appear in tiny, hard-to-read print.

https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-bulletins/ia_newsletters.html

floridagrl25

09/27/16 4:05 PM

#106445 RE: LOVE*PINK #106439

DollarTIME ~ Maybe reading the NXGH 10-Qs would be helpful in understanding why there is continuing TOXIC DEBT & DILUTION here. It's all spelled out. Look ====>>>>>


Net loss from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016, was $3,749,464 compared to a loss of $279,546 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

The Company may not have sufficient resources to fully develop any new products or expand our inventory levels unless it is able to raise additional financing. The Company can make no assurances these required funds will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities would result in dilution to our existing stockholders. Additionally, these conditions may increase costs to raise capital and/or result in further dilution. The failure to raise capital when needed, will adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and could force the Company to reduce or cease operations.


http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11556341
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11468928