Nobody knows until that transparency that Dan talked about begins. Typically the CEO of a scam will wait until he is no longer a director to begin selling but that is also normally done when the replacement CEO makes his pitch.
This case is unique as they fired Scott which indirectly says they are not working together. Although its also possible that Scott is OK with being fired if it will help gain the pps.
I personally doubt that scenario as Scott is attempting a new scam and the bad reputation cant help.
Now the question is when/if Scott sells.
He could wait for the pump and dump into news out of spite or attempt to wait for the spike and dump at the top which is risky without the inside info. (Which as a major shareholder he has limited access to)
It will be a good learning experience since a CEO being fired is rare.
I think Dan should have given reason for those that havent followed the Scott scam. It would look better.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
