Replies to post #4687 on Arcam AB fka AMAVF

[pdb2]

TOM since you put the issue in play again, I will inform you of my prospective and you and others can agree with me or disagree and I will apologize if warranted. Most of your points I will have to agree to disagree with as I think you are being finiky. And if finiky upsets you, so be it as it describes my opinion of some of you posts.

1. Perhaps dead wrong was obsessive and I apologize for it. If it will suit you sensibilities I will use just wrong when I show that a statement is fallacious.

2. I think the references in your last example were warranted given the extent of the inaccuracies I pointed out and how every. time he saw an article referencing a competitor he immediately would post the existence of deadly competition to arcam when they were not even producing the same item.

3. Bald statements. Guess you are ignorant of the term. Bald, not bold, means when a poster simply states a conclusion and does not provide authority or reasoning for such a conclusion. Such as He knows how many shares GE has. Or when anyone simply concludes such as arcam will not have good sales because of the lack of PRs. etc.

4. Hope you don't get attacked was totally justified. You and Charlie have both posted that they don't care about GE's vision or want posts to be resticted to arcam related stuff and yet frequently post non arcam related stuff. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander and if you attack others for that you should not do it yourself and you do. That is not derisive, its noting you hypociticalness. Especially when the post WAS arcam related as I showed.


Guess that addresses the points you made in detail. I've addressed many of these in greater detail in other posts and incorporate them herein by reference.

But I do apologize for my typing and sometimes lack of proofing as sometimes I have time constrains.

Bottom line, I disagree that my posts have been insulting, character assassination or the other adjectives you used. I would appreciate the comments of some others as to whether or why my language offends as I only intend to agree or disagree. And a little humor is not bad. Comments, but not from you TOm who obviously has an ax to grind as is hypocritical, frequently posting non arcam issues and attacking others for doing same.
Perhaps you might address the issues I raise rather than how I raise them.

Now lets focus on the main issues and leave this drivel alone.

[charlie T colton]

Why ARCM is worth > SEK600 to me

A lot more. The operative words are "to me".

Making things and making things work better is and has been my life's work. I heard about 3d printing and was immediately hooked. I'd didn't need an advanced market analysis to tell me what possibilities existed with the technology - the ideas for uses kept racing through. Reading Carl Bass' article The past, present and future of 3-D printing - August 24, 2011 fueled the fire even more. While studying Tuan TramPham's matrix (Infographic: 3D Printing explained - Aug 10, 2012), I came to the realization that it wasn't only the inventors and industry that were going to open new fields of business, but that some of the printer manufacturers would succeed and make money. Some, a lot of money. Arcam easily rose above the rest as a company with a great future.

I've been buying shares in lots big and small since then. I've never doubted the promise that Arcam's technology held not only for additive manufacturing, but manufacturing as a whole.

I believed early on what Dave Joyce and Jeff Immelt recently told the General Electric investors (General Electric Co Conference Call to Discuss Acquisition of Arcam AB and SLM Solutions Group AG.
Dave Joyce - "We see this market and we're not alone. I would say that all the analysts that really follow additive see this on the precipice of a big trajectory, and I can tell you just from our use case within the Aerospace business we couldn't agree more."
Jeff Immelt - "And I would say the backdrop to all this is an equipment market anyhow that's growing in excess of 20% to 30% a year. So there's a ton of opportunity out there."


Those quotes aren't the reason for my expectation that Arcam will grow and grow BIG. They're an acknowledgement from (dare I say) titans of industry today.

My projections for the share price fall somewhere in this range over this timeline. I'm not alone here. I used the closing share price of SEK 186.00 on September 5th as the starting point. Keep in mind that I'm a buy and hold investor. I seek the best and watch how the companies grow over time.














Thank you Tuan!




Again, I'm not shouting.