InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Rdunn88

09/22/16 5:52 PM

#159994 RE: Rdunn88 #159993

Must read on phase costs. Interesting how the average cost of trials increase a few million each-year. So the longer the delay "in any trial" the costs will increase. 30 million over 2 years could easily go up... So, the need to find better financing will only magnify. Once again, putting all-the-pressure on P to find a partner...

https://www.quora.com/How-much-do-clinical-trials-for-drugs-cost
icon url

BonelessCat

09/22/16 5:56 PM

#159999 RE: Rdunn88 #159993

P is already a success. It can't fail. Even if it is less effective against moderate to severe cases, they will market it against less severe cases due to its very low toxicity, which has already been demonstrated.
icon url

sox040713

09/22/16 6:13 PM

#160005 RE: Rdunn88 #159993

I don't think you understood my post. CTIX does NOT need to raise the $30M if they can find a partner for ABSSSI, even if P fails. The partner will pay for P3. According to NR, B is a lock vs. Vancomycin in P3. So who wouldn't want a potentially $1B drug?

So if P fails, you expect nothing to be effected, therefore CTIX can easily raise 30 million over 2 years?

icon url

MinnieM

09/22/16 6:28 PM

#160010 RE: Rdunn88 #159993

Prurisol has already shown effectiveness in the last trial. I view the next trial more as dose optimization.






In Reply to 'Rdunn88'
So if P fails, you expect nothing to be effected, therefore CTIX can easily raise 30 million over 2 years? LOL