Replies to post #82982 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[icgreen22]

He is simply trying to focus everyone's attention to something other than what's happening "now".It's something he does well,and he should be ignored.

[brewskih]

Breacher get your facts straight. I responded to a post by JP, so if rehashing is what you call it then you best look to him.

He brought up the issue of the patents and how SCANBUY is walking the legal tightrope and thats how we got on that discussion. I pointed out if he is right then Scanbuy has complied since 2004. It was then that SUCCESS and others decided to rehash the issue of what the patents pertain to. I was only talking about Scanbuy being in compliance with the court order, as was stated by JP.

As to the issue of whats covered by the patents, the court will decide that, so you are right, there was no sense in others here jumping on that bandwagon to divert the issue. The point I made was that if as JP stated Scanbuy has complied with the cease and desist order since 2004, then there are no damage awards from NEOM from that date forward. Success and others have repeatedly stated the new partners of Scanbuy are facing troubles. They are not facing any issues by aligning with Scanbuy, if Scanbuy is in fact complying with a cease and desist order since 2004.