Replies to post #352682 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[JosephS]

What I am saying is actually not absurd. Given what has occurred here, it is opening the door that this could happen with a crook in office.

If they can take everything, they can take EVERYTHING.

They could reassure the Treasury market. Say it is in the best interests of the nation and that it will be used to pay off debt.

Why not?

[Donotunderstand]

At first I thought the below ABSURD

But - indeed - if courts continue to say that Shareholders are castrated and that COURTS can not judge the conservator or FHFA etc.

Then if the GOV did the below --- WHO WOULD STOP IT ? HOW WOULD THEY STOP IT?

My phrasing a tad different - but since NO ONE can change or review the actions of the FHFA then --- in an extension of logic - the FHFA has free reign to do anything it wants

JospephS or Navy or ?

I strongly encourage you folks (or anyone else who has contacted the various plaintiff attorneys) to forward this "extension" to them

Does anyone know if any of the plaintiff written material - say at the appeals court - presents this logical extension of the lower court actions ?

To me it shows exactly why the Appeals court must find that at some point - for some action - the Judicial Stripping - must fall and plaintiffs must be allowed to trial (to make their case in a trial ---- that is all that is being asked )