I think Ruppert knows the answer to that question, but he can't figure out a way to use it to his advantage so he's playing dumb. Ruppert has been exposed. Dummy.
Can Ruppert explain the following. Why is Jason Ruppert filing a lawsuit against NGCG about the Kalisky Convertible note that was settled when Pamela filed a lawsuit against NGCG:
On 04/26/2015 Pamela Ruppert filed a 2 page Complaint: Case Number: CACE15007188 - http://docdro.id/HNZYg2o
In the settlement agreement - NGCG agreed to issue Pamela Ruppert 70 million Common shares of the NGCG stock. This is significant - on 05/14/2015 NGCG issued Ruppert 40,000,000 shares and on 06/05/2015 NGCG issued Ruppert 30,000,000 shares to satisfy the settlement agreement.
But the Ruppert Lawsuit: Case Number: CACE16008940
In Item 8 it states: “On January 30, 2015 NGCG executed convertible note promising to pay to the order of Lorne Kalisky or registered assigns the sum of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) within 6 weeks of the date the convertible note was executed.”
In Item 10 it states: “On or Around March 27, 2015 Kalisky conveyed, transferred and assigned interests under the convertible note to Ruppert though a debt purchase agreement.
Keep in mind that the Kalisky note was supposed to be assigned to Pamela Ruppert not Jason Ruppert and Pamela is not listed on the lawsuit as she has already settled with NGCG and collected.
Don't forget that in the Promissory Notes filed with the Court there are two checks signed by Pamela Ruppert and they certainly aren't the same person signing the check.
I put together the documents and sent it to the NGCG attorney and I am getting ready to send a copy to the Court.
Ruppert's days of scamming NGCG shareholders are over - Ruppert and Pamela are headed to prison.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
