InvestorsHub Logo

big-yank

09/07/16 7:17 PM

#351964 RE: big-yank #351957

Too bad Hamish Hume didn't read this two year old article before blowing his foot off with a stupid brief filed before the court.

Hamish has 3 basic points he is using to stave off a dismissal. Breach of contract is the ONE that most cite as having a chance for success, while "taking" and "self dealing" appear to be easily dismissed by the empowerment granted by HERA.

Now it appears that Richard Epstein SHOT DOWN his single best opportunity to avoid confirmation of dismissal in a treatise available to everyone back in 2014. Nice job on diligence. LOL.

JMHO.

Zmarzz

09/08/16 12:13 AM

#351981 RE: big-yank #351957

Richard Epstein serves as a consultant to some of the institutional investors that are trying to eliminate the net profit sweep.
It is logical to assume that before an attorney like Hume files a brief, that he forwards a copy to Epstein for his comments.
In recent articles published in FORBES, Epstein continues to be very positive about the Perry appeal.
I do not think you are analyzing the situation correctly. In fact, it is very difficult for anybody who did not graduate from law school to provide good commentary, and that includes me as well.
What about you? Are you a lawyer?

Donotunderstand

09/08/16 12:02 PM

#352007 RE: big-yank #351957

SP D?